Dog food reviews
Dog Food Analysis
Dog food information
Dog food reviews and ratings
Home Information Dog food reviews Frequently asked questions Forums About DFA

Reviews Views Date of last review
1 18283 Tue January 1, 2008
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
No recommendations None indicated None indicated

2kg - 10kg feed 13g - 20g x kg
11kg - 30kg feed 10g - 13g x kg
+ 30kg feed 9g - 10g x kg

Metabolised energy 4020 kcal

Rice, lamb, animal fat, fish meal, hydrolysed chicken protein, rice protein, beetpulp, linseed, yeast, fructooligosaccharides, salt, lecithin, sodium pyrophosphate, tagetes extract, lecithin, b-carotene.

Crude protein 23%,
crude fat 14%,
humidity 10%,
crude ash 7%,
crude fiber 2,5%,
calcium 1,6%,
phosphorous 0,9%.

Vitamin A 12000 IE/kg,
vitamin D3 1200 IE/kg,
vitamin E 120 mg/kg,
copper (copper II sulphate) 20 mg/kg,
biotin 1gr/kg,
natural antioxidants.


Registered: October 2005
Posts: 3953
Review Date: Tue January 1, 2008 Would you recommend the product? No | Price you paid?: Not Indicated | Rating: 0 

Pros: Second and fourth ingredients are named meat products
Cons: Insufficient meat content, low quality ingredients, controversial filler

The first grain in this food, and its main ingredient is rice. Rice is a decent quality grain, but still a grain which is not a natural foodstuff for a canine. Instead, foods intended for dogs should be based on meat.

The second ingredient is named meat product. It is lamb, inclusive of water content (about 80%). Once that is removed, as it must be to create a dehydrated product, the ingredient will weigh around 20% of its wet weight. Ingredients are listed in order of weight, and the dehydrated ingredient would probably be more accurately placed much further down the ingredient list. It is thus unlikely that the food contains very much meat content at all. There is a further meat ingredient 5th on the ingredient list, this time in meal form. As this is, in fact, the primary meat ingredient in the food, it is too far down to make any substantial contribution to the overall meat content of the food. We note it is a fish ingredient, but we find no sign on the manufacturer website of a guarantee that they use only ethoxyquin-free protein sources in the product (ethoxyquin is a chemical preservative commonly added to fish ingredients, but which is banned or heavily regulated in human food due to the belief that it is carcinogenic). Hydrolised chicken protein is added to increase the protein content of the food, but this is not a high quality ingredient and does not substitute for actual meat content. Rice protein is further low quality protein added to the food.

Animal fat is a further low quality ingredient rarely found in anything but very low quality foods. Animal fat is an ingredient of unidentified origin for which it is impossible to determine species, source or quality. Unidentified ingredients are usually very low quality. AAFCO define this asobtained from the tissues of mammals and/or poultry in the commercial processes of rendering or extracting. It consists predominantly of glyceride esters of fatty acids and contains no additions of free fatty acids. If an antioxidant is used, the common name or names must be indicated, followed by the words "used as a preservative". We note this is the 3rd ingredient and that research at Purdue university has identified fat in the top four ingredients of dry food as a factor increasing the risk of bloat in large breed dogs. Smaller breeds are untested.

Beet pulp is controversial filler which appears to be used in large quantities in this food. It is a by-product, being dried residue from sugar beets which has been cleaned and extracted in the process of manufacturing sugar. It is a controversial ingredient in dog food, claimed by some manufacturers to be a good source of fibre, and derided by others as an ingredient added to slow down the transition of rancid animal fats and causing stress to kidney and liver in the process. We note that beet pulp is an ingredient that commonly causes problems for dogs, including allergies and ear infections, and prefer not to see it used in dog food. There are less controversial products around if additional fibre is required. We appreciate the use of whole eggs in the food, but this small glimmer of a positive statement is dwarfed by the preceeding criticisms.

Powered by: ReviewPost PHP
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.

Copyright 2005 - 2009 All Rights Reserved.