Dog food reviews
Dog Food Analysis
Dog food information
Dog food reviews and ratings
Home Information Dog food reviews Frequently asked questions Forums About DFA




Reviews Views Date of last review
1 10602 Mon March 24, 2008
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
No recommendations None indicated None indicated
sr.jpg


Description: Ingredients
Whole rice (40%), salmon meal (17.50% dry weight), naked oats, peas, sunflower oil, whole linseed, sugar beet pulp, vitamins and minerals.


Free from artifical flavourings, colourants and preservatives.


Typical analysis:
Protein 20%
Fibre 3.5%
Oil 12%
Ash 5.8&
Vitamin A 10000 iu/kg
Vitamin E 280 iu/kg
Vitamin D 1500 iu/kg
Copper 10mg/kg.



Editors

Registered: October 2005
Posts: 3953
Review Date: Mon March 24, 2008 Would you recommend the product? No | Price you paid?: Not Indicated | Rating: 0 

 
Pros: Second ingredient is a named meat product, generally good quality ingredients
Cons: Insufficient meat content, controversial filler

The primary ingredient in this food is rice. Rice is a decent quality grain, but it is still a grain which is an unnatural foodstuff for a canine. Dog food products should be based on meat, not on grains. Oats, further down the ingredient list, are also a good quality grain, but our concern here is in quantity compared to a rather low meat content.


The meat content of the food is in a named meat product, in meal form. We just wish there was more of it.


Peas, sunflower oil and linseed (flaxseed) are all good quality ingredients.


Beet pulp is a controversial filler. It is a by-product, being dried residue from sugar beets which has been cleaned and extracted in the process of manufacturing sugar. It is a controversial ingredient in dog food, claimed by some manufacturers to be a good source of fibre, and derided by others as an ingredient added to slow down the transition of rancid animal fats and causing stress to kidney and liver in the process. We note that beet pulp is an ingredient that commonly causes problems for dogs, including allergies and ear infections, and prefer not to see it used in dog food. There are less controversial products around if additional fibre is required.


No information is given about the added vitamins and minerals, which may include synthetics.


As should be clear by this point, the overall quality of this product appears to be quite good (with some minor exceptions). The major concern we have with the food is that its meat content is too low. Users might consider supplementing this diet with additional meat (or fish).


Powered by: ReviewPost PHP
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.



Copyright 2005 - 2009 DogFoodAnalysis.com. All Rights Reserved.